The March 18, 2026 revision note for the 2019-2023 5-year ACS/PRCS describes the pre-revision files as indexed to 2022 dollars, but a record-level comparison of the two vintages says the correction was not uniform across survey years. The note reads:
Previously, the monetary values for all years in these 2023 5-year samples (2019-2023) were indexed to the 2022 dollar value. These samples are now correctly indexed to the 2023 dollar value.
I still have the pre-revision copy of that file, so I matched it against a current extract person by person (on SAMPLE, SERIAL, PERNUM) and took the ratio of corrected INCWAGE to the old value. If the old file had been uniformly indexed to 2022 dollars, that ratio should be one constant, the 2022-to-2023 step of about 1.041, in every survey year. It is different in each survey year:
| MULTYEAR | corrected / pre-revision (median) | matched records |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1.01331 | 1,598,759 |
| 2020 | 1.04832 | 1,287,403 |
| 2021 | 1.08091 | 1,551,182 |
| 2022 | 1.04125 | 1,639,193 |
| 2023 | 1.00000, no record changed | 1,666,763 |
That is 7.74 million records with positive wage income in both versions, and more than 99% of each year’s records sit within 0.001 of that year’s median.
Two things there do not fit the note. The 2023 records did not move at all, where a uniform 2022 indexing would have needed the same 1.041 as every other year. And each year’s ratio is instead very close to that year’s own single-year inflation step, so 2019 got roughly the 2019-to-2020 step, 2020 the 2020-to-2021 step, and so on, which also lines up with the year-over-year steps implied by your CPI99 table. What that looks like to me is that each survey year received the following year’s adjustment factor, so every pre-2023 year came up one year short. On that reading, the 2022 records are the only ones the note describes exactly, since they would have received the 2023 factor of 1.0 and stayed at nominal 2022 dollars.
Just thought I would raise this for awareness and in case it would help others.
Thanks!
CJ