I downloaded the 2000-2002 ACS data from IPUMS to look into the distribution of rentsub
. It looks as though the vast majority of people receiving rental subsidies are reporting their rent payments to ACS rather than their contract rent. rentsub
indicates a subsidy much more often for those reporting very low rents. ACS is trying to collect contract rent, right? Do we have reason to believe that rent data after 2002 is more reflective of contract rents than the 2000-2002 data?
For details, here is my Stata code. I did not adjust for inflation; nominal values 2000-2002 are pooled.
replace hhincome = . if inlist(hhincome, 0, 9999999, 9999998)
replace rentgrs = . if rentgrs == 0
xtile hhinc_dec = hhincome [w=hhwt] if pernum == 1, nq(10)
xtile rentgrs_dec = rentgrs [w=hhwt] if pernum == 1, nq(10)
gen rentsub_d = .
replace rentsub_d = 0 if rentsub < 2
replace rentsub_d = 1 if inlist(rentsub, 2, 3, 4)
table rentburden_dec hhinc_dec if pernum == 1 [w=hhwt], statistic(mean rentsub_d) nformat(%9.3f mean)
Results:
(frequency weights assumed)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 10 quantiles of hhincome
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total
---------------------------+---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10 quantiles of rentburden |
1 | 0.874 0.626 0.496 0.254 0.134 0.075 0.058 0.035 0.022 0.016 0.083
2 | 0.814 0.704 0.295 0.096 0.040 0.022 0.013 0.010 0.009 0.006 0.062
3 | 0.855 0.608 0.147 0.047 0.023 0.015 0.011 0.009 0.007 0.004 0.064
4 | 0.824 0.452 0.098 0.043 0.017 0.011 0.004 0.004 0.000 0.003 0.076
5 | 0.784 0.375 0.076 0.033 0.015 0.018 0.013 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.109
6 | 0.783 0.298 0.071 0.032 0.020 0.012 0.007 0.009 0.010 0.000 0.169
7 | 0.663 0.160 0.053 0.036 0.020 0.010 0.014 0.004 0.000 0.000 0.141
8 | 0.393 0.100 0.062 0.037 0.020 0.012 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.124
9 | 0.208 0.095 0.079 0.036 0.031 0.015 0.028 0.000 0.000 0.135
10 | 0.198 0.127 0.052 0.015 0.087 0.000 0.186
Total | 0.337 0.184 0.087 0.047 0.028 0.022 0.019 0.016 0.013 0.013 0.115
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------