I agree that it seems likely that most of these should be 0s, but another option is that some of them should be 999,9997 or 999,9998. There are a small number of cases with 999,999 values for realprop_1 in the 1850-1880 linked file too (but way fewer than in the 1860-1880 and 1870-1880 linked files, which do not have 0 values for realprop_1 as you note). Thank you for context for clarifying this issue; I will continue to follow up with my colleagues who worked on the linked files to track down an answer (and hopefully documentation) for you to provide to reviewers.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Linking back IPUMS LINKED REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE case to their original Census sample | 1 | 453 | August 2, 2018 | |
| No top code value of '99997' in PROPTAX in ASEC 2013-2019. Just NAs | 2 | 446 | March 12, 2019 | |
| PROPTX99 - N/A code | 7 | 404 | May 20, 2021 | |
|
Can I link 1880 NAPP sample to 1880 1% IPUMS sample?
|
2 | 406 | December 13, 2018 | |
| Missing data to replicate a paper - USA 1850 100% | 1 | 195 | April 19, 2023 |