raceeth is a variable created by another user in the online analysis tool that uses responses from RACE and HISPAN; it codes respondents of any race who reported being Hispanic into a Latino category. For example, someone who identified as Black and Hispanic will be coded as Latino and will not be included in the non-Hispanic Black category. Using this variable in combination with POVERTY and STATEFIP in the online analysis tool (see screenshot below), I’m finding that non-hispanic Blacks form 9.4% of the proportion of individuals under 125% of poverty in Iowa. This corresponds to 43,548 individuals from a total of 114,523, or around 38% of the total non-hispanic Black population of Iowa. This is within the margin of error of the official Census ACS data table which reports that 38.4% (with a 2.3% margin of error) of the state population that identifies as only Black or African American earns less than 125% of the poverty line. I recommend reviewing the variable description for POVERTY to note how it is constructed to determine if it’s comparable to the data your organization collected.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty estimate inconsistency in ACS 2022 5-year estimates | 19 | 995 | October 10, 2024 | |
| Discrepancy between IPUMS and census.gov data for same survey | 2 | 354 | January 25, 2021 | |
| Poverty rate on 2016 ACS | 10 | 977 | January 19, 2018 | |
| IPUMS USA and IPUMS CPS Mismatch | 1 | 131 | April 4, 2025 | |
| Why is the American FactFinder have considerable higher poverty rates than ACS 2014 PUMS | 1 | 456 | April 21, 2016 |

