Hi IPUMS,
First, thanks for the wonderful resouce. I’m a first time ACS user and it’s very helpful.
I’m having trouble with my population estimates and I think I might be using the wrong PUMA list. I’m working with 2008-2012 5 year ACS and, as a check, I’m trying to recreate the total population of Los Angeles County. Using the PUMA list from your ASCII file, I came up with 67 PUMAs that are “equivalent” to LA county. Yet, when I run my frequency using perwt I come up with 7,938,772 for the total. What I am doing wrong?
Thanks!
The PUMA list I’m using:
| 4500 |
| 4600 |
| 4700 |
| 4800 |
| 4900 |
| 5000 |
| 5100 |
| 5200 |
| 5300 |
| 5401 |
| 5402 |
| 5403 |
| 5404 |
| 5405 |
| 5406 |
| 5407 |
| 5408 |
| 5409 |
| 5410 |
| 5411 |
| 5412 |
| 5413 |
| 5414 |
| 5415 |
| 5416 |
| 5417 |
| 5418 |
| 5419 |
| 5420 |
| 5421 |
| 5422 |
| 5423 |
| 5424 |
| 5500 |
| 5600 |
| 5701 |
| 5702 |
| 5703 |
| 5800 |
| 5900 |
| 6000 |
| 6101 |
| 6102 |
| 6103 |
| 6104 |
| 6105 |
| 6106 |
| 6107 |
| 6108 |
| 6109 |
| 6110 |
| 6111 |
| 6112 |
| 6113 |
| 6114 |
| 6115 |
| 6116 |
| 6117 |
| 6118 |
| 6119 |
| 6120 |
| 6121 |
| 6122 |
| 6123 |
| 6124 |
| 6125 |
| 6126 |