# Relationship between Counties and 2010 PUMAs

**URL:** <https://forum.ipums.org/t/relationship-between-counties-and-2010-pumas/2233>\
**Category:** USA\
**Created:** [March 23, 2018, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.ipums.org/t/relationship-between-counties-and-2010-pumas/2233 "2018-03-23T16:37:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RDickens](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a698b9/32.png) [@RDickens](https://forum.ipums.org/u/RDickens)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2018, 4:37pm UTC](https://forum.ipums.org/t/relationship-between-counties-and-2010-pumas/2233/1 "2018-03-23T16:37:00Z")

</div>

I am looking for information on the links between Counties and PUMAs for 2010. In particular I need the data on the population split for each county within each PUMA. This data exists for 1990 and 2000 on the IPUMS website. For example, the link below shows the relationship between PUMAs and standard census geographies (including counties) for the 2000 PUMAs. The file provides a detailed breakdown of how the population for each PUMA is allocated across counties (and other geographies). I cannot find a similar file for the 2010 PUMAs - that will be derived from the 2010 Census. Thanks in advance for your help!

[https://usa.ipums.org/usa/volii/2000P…](https://usa.ipums.org/usa/volii/2000PUMAsASCII.txt)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.ipums.org/t/relationship-between-counties-and-2010-pumas/2233)._